ACA Medicaid expansion resulted
in unanticipated negative consequences for many patients and physicians in
rural, underserved, or medically isolated communities across America.
Consolidation of healthcare entities was financially incentivized by the ACA
and slowly my beloved corner of the Pacific Northwest is becoming a medical
wasteland.
In a beautiful community on
the Olympic peninsula, just north of where I live and practice, it happened again;
another private clinic sold to a large medical corporation. Peninsula
Children’s Clinic was a bustling pediatric office meeting the vital complex
healthcare needs of children in Port Angeles, WA for the commercially insured as
well as Medicaid patients. Why were they
forced to close? A phone call with their office manager six months ago
foreshadowed the outcome, “we are losing a great deal of revenue seeing
Medicaid patients making it difficult to survive.
Peninsula Children’s Clinic was
unable to remain financially solvent, so they were purchased, like a horse on
the auction block, by the Olympic Medical
Center. Their website recently
posted the following:
“Peninsula Children's Clinic
is now licensed as part of Olympic Medical Center.
Patients seeking care at
these hospital-based clinics may receive a separate billing for a facility-fee. This fee could result in higher out-of-pocket
expenses for patients.
Patients should contact their
insurance company to determine their coverage for hospital-based clinic
facility charges.”
Hospital-based clinics tack
on “facility fee” charges, which are separate from the bill for the doctors’
services, for the use of the room in which the patient was seen. One hospital
administrator told me to think of it as “room rental.”
Facility fees bring in a
considerable flow of cash and have the secondary benefit of incentivizing
hospitals to buy independent practices because then the hospital can charge two
to five times more. Buying independent practices,
like Peninsula Children's Clinic, expands the hospitals’ market share and
allows greater leverage when negotiating reimbursements.
Payers must acquiesce and pay
the facility fees. As the payers are
forced to pay more to the hospitals and hospital-based clinics, guess where
they make cuts? They cut their fees to the independent private practice
physicians, already struggling to make ends meet. My practice was notified of the impending 50% cut in reimbursement from Kaiser
Permanente for specific codes just last week for private providers. In the meantime, as the government incentivized
hospitals, are costs getting lower? Are consumers spending less? Are outcomes
improving at record speed? Nope, and they won’t be anytime soon.
Medicare pays double the
amount for office visits at hospital-owned clinics as compared to private
physician offices, according to 2012 and 2014 reports by the Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission (MEDPAC), an agency that guides Congress on Medicare
spending. For example, Medicare paid $453 for an echocardiogram at
hospital-owned facilities, yet the same test performed at an independently owned
physician office costs, on average, $189, according to the 2014
report. In its 2012
report, MEDPAC found Medicare paid 80 percent more for a 15-minute visit at
a hospital-based clinic compared to one at a private practice.
Based on the prediction Medicare
spending would increase $2 billion by 2020, MEDPAC lobbied Congress to equalize
payments between hospital-based and private physician offices by eliminating the
onerous facility fee. Eliminating the facility fee and setting hospital
reimbursement equal to that of independent physicians for 66 procedure groups, results
in $900 million per year in savings on Medicare costs. However, eliminating the charges has proved
daunting, for $3 trillion “reasons.”
Although MEDPAC has long promoted
the idea of “site neutral payments,” the hospital lobby deafened Congress to this
important recommendation. The American
Hospital Association opposes MEDPAC’s recommendations on several grounds,
including facility fees are warranted because they create the financial incentive
hospitals “need” to shore up “loss leaders” like the ER, where they are
obligated to treat everyone, regardless of ability to pay. Hospitals say the money
helps make up for low government reimbursement rates and pay expenses outside
of patient care, ranging from electric bills to hospital administrator salaries.
Consumer groups, such as Health Watch USA , say hospitals are
charging patients, insurance companies and Medicare more without reason. Their board chairman, Kevin Kavanagh, has
emphasized in many newspaper articles
and publications that these fees are “essentially double billing”, without
improving quality or patient outcomes. Many
watchdog groups believe the fees have persisted to promote mergers between
hospitals and clinics. Organizations,
like the Association of Independent Doctors
has emphasized facility fees add “zero value” for the additional cost.
The facility fee adds billions of dollars to the nation’s health-care
costs. Patients with private insurance are responsible for as much as a 15% portion
of the facility fee. One family in Port Angeles accustomed to paying $125 in
out-of-pocket costs for doctor visits saw their costs skyrocket to more than $500
overnight. The increase reflects the new
“facility fee” charge. Now, this family
drives 2 hours each way to see me, because after accounting for gas and time,
it costs less to visit my office than to visit Olympic Medical Center.
The movie, “You've Got Mail,”
succinctly illustrates the differences between small and large practices. Meg Ryan
closes the doors to her specialty bookstore, Little Shop Around the Corner, for
the last time and wanders over to the newly opened big-box Fox Books to browse
the children’s section. In one memorable
scene, a desperate mother runs in asking an employee where to find the “Shoe
series” of books for her daughter. The hapless clerk blankly repeats “Shoe
books?” Meg rolls her eyes and rattles off a list of multiple books in the
series from memory, including her recommendation of which to read first, to
which the mother was extremely grateful.
I am the Little Shop Around
the Corner, as are many surviving, independent physicians across this great nation. We know our patients, their healthcare, and
are effective, efficient, well-oiled machines. Facility fees must be made transparent for
patients or abolished, like they did by law with Public
Act No. 15-146 in Connecticut. Studies
continually show small clinics provide better quality care for lower cost, have
fewer hospital admissions, and keep patients healthier than the hospital-based
clinics. We must eliminate the onerous facility
fee to level the playing field, eliminate the incentive for hospitals to create
monopolies, and save Americans 100s of billions of dollars per year.
This just burns me up! I am not a doctor, but I have been working for one for quite a while, and he is fiercely independent. Hell would have to freeze over for him to be willing to be bought out by the local monopolistic hospital, and he would probably still go down fighting. I try to explain to as many people as possible how the large corporate health care systems try to convince people that they offer economy of scale, and to that I say, "Horse pucky!"
ReplyDeleteYou are right Susan! Hell will have to freeze over before I sell out as well. Here is hoping the independent docs can survive and thrive!
DeleteI am all for independent docs surviving and thriving. I firmly believe they are the key to lowering health care costs. contrary to the claims of the large health care systems.
Delete