Recently, President-Elect Trump selected Rep. Tom
Price, MD to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. Suffice it to say, this signals Mr. Trumps’
resolve and commitment to definitively repealing and replacing. Dr. Price has already sunk his teeth into
health care reform, having proposed alternative healthcare solutions in every
Congressional session since 2009. As a
physician myself, I am delighted at the prospect of having another doctor at the
helm of HHS. The last physician to lead HHS was Louis Sullivan, MD as part of
the administration of George H.W. Bush. Having
a physician, who can understand the needs of physicians and patients, representing
both in health policy decision making at the federal level gives everyone the
best chance for meaningful and successful health care reform.
Dr. Price is a third generation physician and a retired
orthopedic surgeon with experience in clinical practice and academia before
being elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. At his core, he has been a fierce critic of
Obamacare. Dr. Prices’ most frequent objection to the ACA is the
fact it hinders the ability of patients and physicians to be in control of medical
decision making and puts the government squarely between doctors and patients. Amen! He understands the subtle distinction
that while expanding coverage may provide insurance, it is in no way akin to delivering
patients unfettered access to health care.
As I fend off increasing government regulations in
my quest for survival as an independent physician, Dr. Price (and Seema Verma –
Mr. Slavitts’ replacement at CMS) seem like an oasis in the desert. Below are some basic tenets of the Price Plan,
The Empowering Patients First Act.
1. Tax credits so individuals
may buy insurance on the private market. It starts at $1,200 a year and increases
with age, but is not adjusted for income. People on Medicaid, Medicare, and Tricare,
could opt to buy private insurance and receive this tax credit.
- Expansion of health savings accounts, which allows people to save pre-tax money which can be used to pay for premiums, copayments, and deductibles.
- Individuals with existing medical conditions cannot be denied coverage if they had continuous insurance for 18 months before selecting a new policy. This continuous coverage provision incentivizes individuals to purchase insurance while young in the hope of creating a long-term insurance pool, (something Obamacare has been unable to accomplish.)
4. Federal money would be given to individual States to
create high-risk pools. These are government-run health plans for people with
existing medical conditions who cannot obtain affordable health insurance on
the private market. Price has suggested using $3 billion in funding for high risk pools—which
comes to $1 billion a year. This
approach carries some inherent risk because cost predictions may underestimate
reality. Critics say high-risk pools have been tried in as many as 34 states and
largely failed because they were routinely underfunded. It is possible the annual cost of high
risk pools at closer to $2.5 billion a year. Fine, make sure we fund this adequately this time.
- Balance billing could be allowed, which evens the playing field for physicians and patients alike. It would offset the exorbitant “facility fee” hospitals are allowed and independent offices are forbidden to charge. Allowing physicians leeway on reimbursement could significantly alter the dismal trend of physicians leaving clinical medicine in droves.
Dr. Price has
criticized “government takeover of healthcare.” I agree with him wholeheartedly. His socially
conservative stances have angered many; he is pro-life, votes against insurance
coverage for women’s health issues, additional funding of CHIP (Children’s
Health Insurance Plan), and LGBT issues.
However, the more I struggle to stay afloat in independent practice, the
less these differences of opinion actually matter. Sylvia Burwell and I probably agree on Womens,
LGBT, and childrens’ health issues, but my bleeding heart, ironically, has
worsened my chance for survival in a career I love. Reality is what brought this very liberal
physician to advocate a different approach to healthcare reform.
Dr. Price
recently stated, “Premiums have gone up, not down. Many Americans lost the
health coverage they were told time and time again by the President that they
could keep. Choices are fewer.” He is
correct. Choice for all of us has
evaporated from the system in many small rural areas suffering from physician
shortages already. Frustration at the overwhelming increases in insurance
premiums is palpable everywhere in this country. Maybe it is time to give Dr. Price and Seema
Verma a chance. There will be many compromises
as in all things, but allowing physicians and patients more control over their
lives and livelihoods is a revolution worth celebrating.
Your account is interesting: We made a similar decision in 1985 when in private practice (Austrian wife, pediatrician; myself, general surgeon):
ReplyDeleteA young gentleman with ruptured spleen (Hemoglobin 3!), broken face, and fractured femur was duly treated with surgery, Imferon, ICU, injection of androgen, and no transfusions--for religious reasons.
He declined to pay (1); we left private practice with $93,000 uncollected in 1985, interviewed with the Air Force, joined the Army, moved to West Germany for 7 years (2), and later transferred to a Navy teaching hospital.
Best decisions we ever made: Good medicine, professional camaraderie, good life in Europe with German schools: We would do it again.
H.E.Butler III M.D., FACS
Commander, Fleet Reserve
HButler@post.Harvard.edu
Cell phone: 757 377 7775
------------------
(1) "You didn't save my life. The 'Lord God Almighty' did." I could not argue with that...
(2) Lived "on the economy" and sent 3 kids to German schools gratis where they learned English with a British accent, German, and either French or Latin. One decided to live there permanently.
Thank you for reading and commenting... I am glad you found a way to love medicine.
Delete