The 4th
amendment of the U.S. Constitution shields an individual (or business) from
unreasonable government intrusion. It is inferred this right extends to ALL
people, regardless of profession. Advanced
nurse practitioners are independently practicing medicine in 23 states yet are
not subject to onerous Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements-- physicians
are not equally protected under the law.
Physicians must fight, as one group, against the burden of MOC. We have two choices: become a Doctor Squared (Dr. ²) or join an
alternative certification organization such as the National Board of Physicians
and Surgeons (NBPAS.)
A Doctor
Squared (Dr. ²) denotes one who obtains both an MD and a DNP (Doctor of Nurse
Practitioner) degree. This allows
independent practice and eliminates the power of MOC. Reviewing a list
of affordable DNP programs in the country shows a degree from the University of
Massachusetts – Boston DNP program only costs $10,180. Coursework is online, and will take only 3 years if attending part-time. Renewal of an MD license in Washington State costs
$697 biannually while DNP license costs
$125, putting more money in my pocket.
Additionally, the continuing education requirement is different;
advanced practice nurses must complete 15 hours annually while physicians need 50
hours annually even though both professions are independently practicing
medicine. According to Medscape, malpractice
insurance rates are $12,000 yearly (2012)
for a family physician, while a family nurse practitioner pays $1200, one-tenth
as high. Remember, the cost of MOC for
internal medicine is $23,600
every 10 years.
While the
American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) argues MOC participation makes for
better doctors, no credible proof supports this assertion; only initial board
certification has been scientifically validated. Seven states
already eliminated MOC compliance to maintain licensure, physician hospital employment,
or insurance contracting, however this same freedom must be extended to the
other 43.
Until then,
an alternative certification pathway through the National Board of Physicians
and Surgeons exists. In 2015, the
Washington State Medical Association resolved
to allow alternative certification, yet MOC remains a requirement for
licensure, hospital employment, and insurance contracting. Recently, HB
2257 was introduced, precluding MOC as a condition for state licensure, though
overlooks the fact hospitals and insurance companies require physicians, but
not nurse practitioners, to comply with MOC.
Why are hospitals
and insurance companies enforcing MOC compliance? Conflict of interest (COI) is defined as a
person or organization experiencing multiple benefits, financial or otherwise,
which can corrupt motivation or decision-making. ABMS appears full of corruption. If there is a risk one decision could be
unduly influenced by a secondary interest, a COI is present. Margaret O’Kane serves on the Board of
Directors at ABMS, and her secondary interest is her role as Founder and
President of the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), the organization
certifying insurance companies. She has
each hand in a different MOC cookie jar.
NCQA
requires that insurers credential only physicians who comply with MOC programs. It appears Ms. O’Kane is profiting from the NCQA
requirement on one hand while forcing physicians to spend millions completing MOC
on the other. While the average
internist earns $150,000 annually, Ms. O’Kane appears to be handsomely
profiting from this “arrangement.” Wikipedia
defines collusion as “an agreement between two or more parties, sometimes
illegal–but always secretive--to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading,
or defrauding others” to gain leverage. It is an agreement between individuals
or corporations to divide a market or limit choice and opportunity. Through Ms. O’Kane, ABMS and NCQA have a connection
while misrepresenting themselves as being independent.
ABMS assumed
physicians would never contest corruption, however numerous brave physicians are
fighting: Dr. Wes Fisher, Dr.
Ron Benbassett, Dr. Meg Edison, and Dr.
Paul Tierstein, who created the National Board of Physicians and Surgeons,
(NBPAS).
While NBPAS has made headway with hospitals, not one insurance company will
credential physicians who refuse MOC. Should
insurance companies be in charge of our healthcare system?
The
Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program was initially voluntary; however when
billions in potential revenue were realized, participation became mandatory. My brave friend and colleague, Meg Edison, MD
refused to re-certify for the third time, yet was forced to bend to the insurer
demands. We have two choices: 1) Become a Dr² –having all the knowledge and
experience of a medical doctor without the regulatory capture or 2) Credential
with NBPAS and leave ABMS and NCQA in the dust.
Regulations will not disappear until physicians realize there is no
healthcare without our blood, sweat, and tears.
May we all find our way once more.
If you are
struggling under the weight of MOC requirements, please consider taking this
survey developed by a Dr. Wes Fisher,
who is leading a crusade against forced MOC compliance. Choice.
Transparency. Autonomy. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PPA_MOCSurvey.
I think there ought to be a different division for the understudy who lose expectations and surrender considering http://www.fellowshippersonalstatements.com/winning-anesthesiology-fellowship-personal-statement/ office will assist them with motivating their valor and get them back on the track. I am truly feeling glad to visit this site.
ReplyDeleteA man can appreciate utilizing innovation notwithstanding sitting in a woods on the grounds that cell phones and PCs can be used anyplace. Just people of urban helpful link areas aren't qualified for use and increase favorable position of innovation however the people of urban zones are additionally meriting and science given them this chance of tech.
ReplyDeleteMDN admission is introduced for the success of the students. All the parts of the medical science and find out more information for the future offers. The timely success is arranged for the terms and parts of the future offs.
ReplyDelete