University
of Southern California (USC) appears to look the other way when male physicians
harass or assault women. In reality, sexual
violence spares no occupation, including medicine, but the way an organization
responds to crime against women indicates a certain level of integrity. The World Health Organization estimates sexual
violence affects one-third of all women worldwide. In a nation where women make
up 50% or more of each incoming medical school class, only sixteen percent of
medical school deans are female, making gender imbalance in leadership positions
nearly impossible to overcome.
For the
second time in less than a year, USC President C.L. Max Nikias is grappling
with sexual misconduct allegations against a physician faculty member. Complaints go back to the early 1990s from staff
and patients about inappropriate comments and aggressive pelvic exams done by
Dr. George Tyndall, the only full-time gynecologist for the past three decades
at the campus clinic. USC ignored complaints
until a nurse contacted the campus rape crisis center.
Dr. Tyndall
was initially suspended pending inquiry and forced to resign shortly thereafter. More than 100 complaints have been received
and five
women are suing USC. Astonishingly,
the founded complaints against Dr. Tyndall were never turned over to authorities
or reported to the Medical Board of California.
USC defended this decision, asserting there was no legal obligation to
report misconduct. USC has a moral and ethical duty to protect students, staff,
and faculty, yet failed on both counts.
USC is no
stranger to scandal. In 2007, Dr. Carmen Puliafito, MD, a Harvard Medical
School graduate, was chosen as Dean at the USC School of Medicine. His background held clues he would be trouble.
Just prior to arrival at USC, Puliafito settled a lawsuit for throwing a
“tantrum” and committing assault and battery against an optometrist named Marc
Brockman at the University of Miami. During
the trial, Miami University disclosed they had previously investigated sexual
harassment complaints against Puliafito too.
Puliafito was
a strategic fundraiser, bringing in over $1 billion in donations for the
Trojans; however, he kept company with criminals and documented his illicit
drug use on video. His nightlife came to
screeching halt when a 21-year-old female companion overdosed
in a Pasadena hotel room and an ambulance transported her to the hospital. Police
confiscated more than 1 gram of methamphetamine from the hotel room, but inexplicably,
no police report was filed until three months later identifying Puliafito as a
witness to the overdose.
An anonymous
witness phoned the office of the USC President Nikias and reported Puliafito’s
activities. Ten days later, Puliafito
resigned, however President Nikias never filed a complaint with the California
Medical Board or the authorities. When
the LA Times discovered Puliafito was still practicing as part of the USC
faculty, President Nikias issued a ‘mea
culpa’ admitting “they could have done better.” Unfortunately, his next choice was anything
but better.
Dr. Rohit
Varma succeeded Puliafito as Dean at the School of Medicine but resigned amid
scandal after less than a year. He had
settled a sexual harassment claim in 2003 and was disciplined by USC. Varma – then a 40-year-old junior professor –
attended a conference with a young international student he was supervising. He allegedly told his student that the grant they
were travelling on only supported staying in a single shared room. When the
student protested, Varma took her phone and threatened to have her visa revoked.
USC reached a $135,000 settlement with the woman, of which Varma paid $11,000. He was ordered to complete sexual harassment
counseling and denied a promotion, yet one year later, earned full professorship,
as if nothing ever happened.
Is USC defending
“bad boys” with little regard for women? Or is there something else going on? One might argue that threatening your
subordinate with visa revocation is borderline sociopathic. Are they being protected because they are
physicians or simply because they are men?
The only way
to answer this question is to look at what happens when a female physician and
male physician have a hostile interaction.
One evening, Dr. Meena Zareh, a cardiology resident at USC, reported
being summoned to a windowless call room by Dr. Guillermo Cortes, her direct supervisor,
to discuss a patient. When she attempted to leave, Dr. Cortes allegedly
overpowered her, blocked the door, and assaulted her. Dr. Zareh shared the incident with a
co-worker afterward but did not report it to law enforcement or the residency
program for fear of reprisal until three months later. Dr. Cortes denied allegations and was placed
on administrative leave pending investigation.
Dr. Cortes
was allowed to return to work but was barred from unsupervised contact with Dr.
Zareh. Reprisals toward Dr. Zareh began almost
immediately, a signal of mounting institutional pressure to sweep her
allegations under the rug. One male supervisor
suggested she take a leave of absence, while others recommended deferring
fellowship training or changing residency programs. Dr. Zareh is suing USC and LA County for
mishandling her report of sexual assault, a mistake in which USC seems to be accumulating
expertise. If the pattern holds, Dr.
Cortes will get a promotion, a raise, and may become a future Dean at the Keck
School of Medicine.
While double
standards remain alive and well in academia, there are rays of hope. Dr. Laura Mosqueda, a geriatric physician, is
one of those. She is the first woman chosen
to lead the Keck School of Medicine since it was established in 1885. It is about time. In the race to become a top-tier program, I have
no doubt Dr. Mosqueda will achieve a great deal more than her
predecessors. After all, how could she do
any worse?